Open science collaboration authors on the rate of reproducibility in psychological science. More than half of psychology papers are not reproducible. The reproducibility project results have just been published in science, a massive, collaborative, open science attempt to replicate 100 psychology experiments published in leading psychology journals. So far, 72 volunteer researchers from 41 institutions have organized to openly and transparently replicate studies published in three prominent psychological journals in 2008. Reproducibility is a defining feature of science, but the extent to. Reproducibility of psychology studies debate continues. We are authors of estimating the reproducibility of psychological science coordinated by the center for open science aua psychology ama last thursday, our article estimating the reproducibility of psychological science was published in science. The reproducibility project is an open, largescale, collaborative effort to systematically examine the rate and predictors of reproducibility in psychological science.
In november 2011, the reproducibility project began, with the goal of obtaining an initial estimate of the reproducibility of psychological science 5. This project was led by the center for open science and its cofounder, brian nosek, who started the project in november 2011. In recent years, it has become painfully clear that psychology is facing a reproducibility crisis, in which even famous, longestablished phenomenathe stuff of textbooks and ted talks. A new analysis published in science suggests the field of psychology might not have the reproducibility problem discovered in a 2015 study.
Keywords methodology, replication, reproducibility, psychological science, open. Aps covers the results of the reproducibility project. We conducted a largescale, collaborative effort to obtain an initial estimate of the reproducibility of psychological science. Reproducibility project 2 estimating the reproducibility. The reproducibility of psychological science mind hacks. The researchers attempted to replicate the conditions of the original experiments as closely as possible. Pdf estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science paper shows low replicability of psychology studies. Pdf reproducibility is a defining feature of science, but the extent to which it characterizes current research is unknown. An open, largescale, collaborative effort to estimate the. Winner of the 2018 british psychological society book award, best academic monograph in the 7 deadly sins of psychology, chambers demonstrates that many psychologists, driven by the imperative to publish in prestigious journals, produce studies with weak data, faulty methodologies, and questionable conclusions. Following a structured protocol, we conducted 100 replications of studies.
Reproducibility is a concern throughout science, he says. Psychology, which showed that the replicability of some psychological science findings were lower than anticipated. Comment on estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. But the authors of last years replication study have hit back themselves in science, calling todays critical paper a very optimistic assessment that is limited by statistical misconceptions and by causal inferences from. We conducted replications of 100 experimental and correlational studies published in three psychology journals using highpowered designs. Reproducibility project 1 estimating the reproducibility of psychological science group author. A paper from the open science collaboration research articles, 28 august 2015, aac4716 attempting to replicate 100 published studies. Nusbaum and dee posey is licensed under a creative commons attributionsharealike 4. Reproducibility and open science psychology as a science. We conducted replications of 100 experimental and correlational studies published in three psychology journals using highpowered designs and. In psychology and other social sciences, many studies fail the reproducibility test. Psychology reproducibility crisis overstated, new report.
In hindsight, the researcher called his study design silly. The researchers attempted to replicate the conditions of the original. Reproducibility can also be applied under changed conditions of measurement for the same measurandto check that the results are not an artefact of the measurement procedures. The reproducibility of psychological science recently, there has been growing concern as psychological research fails to replicate. Scientific claims should not gain credence because of the status or authority of their originator but by the replicability of their supporting evidence. Of course, that doesnt mean that the replicability is 100%, only that the evidence is insufficient to reliably estimate replicability. Psychological science,journal of personality and social psychology,andjournal of experimental psychology. Maximizing the reproducibility of your research psychological science under scrutiny wiley online library. A paper from the open science collaboration research articles, 28 august 2015, aac4716 attempting to replicate 100 published studies suggests that the reproducibility of psychological science is surprisingly low.
Reproducibility is a defining feature of science, but the extent to which it characterizes current research is unknown. We conducted replications of 100 experimental and correlational studies. To give you an idea of the extent of nonreplicability of psychology findings, below are data reported in 2015 by the open science collaboration project, led by university of virginia psychologist brian. Psychology was a collaboration of 270 contributing authors to repeat 100 published experimental and correlational psychological studies. Comment on estimating the reproducibility of psychological. Report demonstrates need for improved reproducibility in psychological science. But as this workshop attests, even though i will talk about my home fields of psychology and neuroscience, its not just these fields. The replication crisis is, as of 2020, an ongoing methodological crisis in which it has been. A 2012 special edition of the journal perspectives on psychological science also. A researcher showed people a picture of the thinker in an effort to study the link between analytical thinking and religious disbelief.
Many psychology findings not as strong as claimed, study says new york times, aug. Open science collaboration1 abstract reproducibility is a defining feature of science, but the extent to which it characterizes current research is unknown. Reproducibility association for psychological science. It started with a report published last year entitled, estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Primary data collection was completed in december 2014, and a summary of the results was published in august 2015 in the journal science. In this study, teams of psychologists were asked to attempt to replicate studies that had been published in 2008 in three journals. Robust science depends on understanding the science of humans. Reproducibility data on display in line with our fields goals of improving openness, methodological rigor, and reproducibility of science, graphical descriptives gds the visualization of research data can be used in the research process and eventually be developed into a. Psychology was launched in 2011 by the center for open science, a us nonprofit organisation, in the wake of a number of fraud scandals in psychology, such as that involving diederik stapel, who admitted in 2011 to faking more than 50 papers. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.
Shots health news many social sciences experiments couldnt be reproduced in a new study. Reproducibility is the closeness of the agreement between the results of measurements of the same measurand carried out with same methodology described in the corresponding scientific evidence. For example, if your instructor says, please put aside your books, take out a clean sheet of paper. We conducted replications of 100 experimental and correlational studies published in three psychology journals using highpowered designs and original materials when available. We conducted replications of 100 experimental and correlational studies published in three psychology journals using highpowered designs and original. The original study reanalyzed and repeated 100 studies published in three psychology journals. The implications of estimating the reproducibility of. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science osf. We address reproducibility across the research lifecycle. No, science s reproducibility problem is not limited to psychology washington post, aug. Psychologys replication crisis is real, many labs 2 says.
The study seriously underestimated the reproducibility of psychological science, it concludes. We conducted replications of 100 experimental and correlational studies published in three psychology journals using highpowered. Resultswe conducted replications of 100 experimental and correlational studies published in three psychology journals using highpowered designs and original materials when available. Investigators from a large consortium of scientists recently performed a multiyear study in which they replicated 100 psychology experiments. Reproducibility project 2 estimating the reproducibility of psychological science group author. Psychological science, the journal of personality and social psychology, and the journal of experimental psychology.
Osf estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Psychological science under scrutiny explores a range of contemporary challenges to the assumptions and methodologies of psychology, in order to encourage debate and ground the discipline in solid science discusses the pointed challenges posed by critics to the field of psychological research, which have given pause to psychological researchers across a broad spectrum of subfields. Reproducibility of experimental research is essential to the. National science foundation report examines concerns about reliability of scientific research psychological science agenda, july 2015. Spellman hails an analysis of reproducibility in psychology by a champion for change. Daniel gilbert, gary king, stephen pettigrew, and timothy wilson. Finally, ill wrap up with some thoughts about the real progress were making, largely due to changes in technology and beahvior. Psychological science publishes cuttingedge empirical research of broad interest and theoretical significance across the field of psychology. Johnson ve1, payne rd1, wang t1, asher a1, mandal s1. For example, if your instructor says, please put aside your books, take out a clean sheet of paper, and. Indeed, the data are consistent with the opposite conclusion, namely, that the reproducibility of psychological science is quite high. Pdf estimating the reproducibility of psychological science etienne p lebel academia. A 2012 special edition of the journal perspectives on psychological science also focused on issues ranging from publication bias to nullaversion that contribute to the replication crises in psychology. The results are sure to be widely debated the biggest result being that many published results were not replicated.
897 361 1432 390 1514 1204 187 1148 970 1114 347 370 342 1350 1080 648 214 1395 743 1041 1111 747 1127 1558 1538 1327 339 427 909 1153 942 601 1052 517 800 840 283 1487 695 747 922 125